Skip to Main Content
Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP
  • Our Firm
    • Who We Serve
      • Shareholders
      • Whistleblowers
      • Consumers
      • Businesses
      • Government Entities
    • Our Professionals
    • Working with Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP
    • Locations
    • News
    • Careers
    • Report Your Concern
    • Testimonials
  • Practice Areas
    • Antitrust Litigation
    • Business & Commercial Litigation
    • Securities & Corporate Governance
    • Healthcare Litigation
    • Consumer Protection
    • Whistle Blower False Claims Litigation
    • Government Representation
    • Employment Litigation
  • Cases
    • Antitrust Litigation Cases
    • Business & Commercial Litigation Cases
    • Consumer Protection Cases
    • Employment Litigation Cases
    • Government Representation Cases
    • Healthcare Litigation Cases
    • Mass Tort Litigation Cases
    • Securities & Corporate Governance Cases
    • Whistle Blower False Claims Cases
  • Investigations
    • Similac Toxic Infant Formula Lawsuit
    • Kid’s Castle Biometric Privacy Lawsuit
    • Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit
    • Fatal Sportmix Pet Food Recall Class Action Lawsuit
    • Claire’s Data Breach Lawsuit
    • Insurance Denial for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Treatment
    • Perpetual Sales Litigation
    • Railroad Price-Fixing Lawsuit
    • Medicare Advantage Fraud Litigation
    • Biometric Fingerprinting Litigation
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
See all blog posts
11.13.2013

Proposed FDA Rule Allows Generic Drug Manufacturers to Update Labeling

By Corey Lorenz, Associate
You Should Know, For Consumers

After much anticipation, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has taken action to place responsibility on generic drug manufacturers to provide adequate warnings to consumers, and hold them legally liable for their failure to do so.  Currently, federal law requires generic drug labeling to match that of their brand-name counterpart, and as a result the Supreme Court held in PLIVA v. Mensing that failure-to-warn claims cannot be brought against the generic drug-maker.  The seeming injustice resulting from this has been a source of controversy and advocacy over the years.  Taking a significant step forward to protect consumers, the FDA has made public a proposed rule on generic drug labeling that could effectively overturn Mensing and provide legal remedy those that have been injured after consuming a generic drug.

The FDA’s proposed rule would allow generic drug manufacturers to initiate changes to their own labeling by submitting a CBE (changes being effected) supplement.  Currently, they cannot initiate those changes on their own and must wait for their brand-name counterpart to do so.  In drafting this rule the FDA illustrates their awareness that not only does the current law leave many consumers without legal recourse, but it fails to create any incentive for generic manufacturers to work in coordination with the FDA to market and label their products safely.  Taking into account that there is little incentive to comply with post-market requirements and ensure that their labels are accurate and up to date, this proposed rule was designed to “create parity” between generic and brand-name manufacturers.  Allowing generic manufacturers to unilaterally initiate changes to product labeling could eliminate the preemption of failure-to-warn clams related to generic drugs.

This proposed rule is not official yet.  First, there is a 60 day time-period where comments can be submitted on the proposed rule.  After this time, the FDA will review the comments and publish a final rule.  This issue is extremely important, and a final rule allowing these changes could potentially protect the legal rights of generic drug users which accounts for over 80% of all prescriptions filled in the United States.  It also ensures that generic drug-makers are responsible and accountable for their products.  The American Associate for Justice is a primary group promoting the implementation of this rule.  To continue their advocacy on this issue, they have created a petition that you can access and participate in by clicking here.

Photo Credit: Ben Harvey

Share

No Comments

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Receive News Updates

Get the latest from Wexler Wallace LLP & stay informed.

Categories

  • Media Appearances
  • Uncategorized
  • Columns
    • Guest Post
    • Ken Wexler
    • Ed Wallace
  • Practice Areas
    • Consumer Protection
    • Mass Tort Litigation
    • Business & Commercial Litigation
    • Healthcare Litigation
    • Employment Litigation
  • Cases
  • Hall Of Shame
    • Villain Of The Week
  • In The News
    • Public Victories
  • Featured Investigations
  • The Firm
    • News releases
    • Around The World
    • Our Professionals
    • Chicago
  • You Should Know
    • For Investors
    • For Businesses
    • For Consumers
  • Featured Cases
  • awards
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Image

311 S. Wacker Drive,
Suite 5450
Chicago, IL 60606
P_312.346.2222
F_312.346.0022

  • Our Firm
  • Practice Areas
  • Cases
  • Investigations
  • Newsroom
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Statement
  • Legal Disclaimer

2022 © Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP