Skip to Main Content
Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP
  • Our Firm
    • Who We Serve
      • Shareholders
      • Whistleblowers
      • Consumers
      • Businesses
      • Government Entities
    • Our Professionals
    • Working with Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP
    • Locations
    • News
    • Careers
    • Report Your Concern
    • Testimonials
  • Practice Areas
    • Antitrust Litigation
    • Business & Commercial Litigation
    • Securities & Corporate Governance
    • Healthcare Litigation
    • Consumer Protection
    • Whistle Blower False Claims Litigation
    • Government Representation
    • Employment Litigation
  • Cases
    • Antitrust Litigation Cases
    • Business & Commercial Litigation Cases
    • Consumer Protection Cases
    • Employment Litigation Cases
    • Government Representation Cases
    • Healthcare Litigation Cases
    • Mass Tort Litigation Cases
    • Securities & Corporate Governance Cases
    • Whistle Blower False Claims Cases
  • Investigations
    • Rental Rate Antitrust Lawsuit
    • Automobile 3G Network Shutdown Lawsuit
    • Similac Toxic Infant Formula Lawsuit
    • Kid’s Castle Biometric Privacy Lawsuit
    • Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit
    • Fatal Sportmix Pet Food Recall Class Action Lawsuit
    • Claire’s Data Breach Lawsuit
    • Insurance Denial for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Treatment
    • Perpetual Sales Litigation
    • Railroad Price-Fixing Lawsuit
    • Medicare Advantage Fraud Litigation
    • Biometric Fingerprinting Litigation
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
See all news
6.3.2019

Jury Awards Plaintiffs $6 Million Against Paint Manufacturers in Wisconsin Lead Poisoning Trial

Following a nearly 4-week long trial in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin, a federal jury returned a $6 million verdict in favor of three plaintiffs for injuries incurred as a result of toxic lead paint exposure. The jurors found that Sherwin Williams, Armstrong Container Corp. (successor to MacGregor Lead Co.), and DuPont acted unreasonably in marketing lead pigment and paint and failed to warn of its dangers to children.

The jury awarded $2 million to each plaintiff, Glenn Burton, Jr., Ravon Owens, and Cesar Sifuentes, for injuries they received from being exposed to lead-based paint as children in their homes dating back decades. Over the course of the trial, jurors heard extensive testimony about neurological testing, chemical analysis, and the health risks concerning lead paint that ultimately led to a ban on use in 1978.

The case is one of few to have gone to trial under a unique Wisconsin “risk contribution theory” law established by the state Supreme Court in 2005, and this is the first verdict of its kind under the law.

“The jury carefully considered all of the evidence establishing that these companies were negligent and created an unimaginable risk of harm, said Ed Wallace, co-lead trial counsel and Wexler Wallace attorney for the plaintiffs.  “They realized that our clients have and will continue to suffer for the rest of their lives because of the acts of these three defendants.”

“Poisoning from lead-based paint has lasting, long-term effects, especially for children exposed at young ages,” said Fidelma Fitzpatrick, co-lead trial counsel and Motley Rice lawyer for the plaintiffs. “Some of these lasting exposure effects, sadly include issues have and will impact them for their entire lives. We are gratified that the jury came to the conclusion that companies that knowingly manufactured these toxic products should be held accountable for the harmful, life altering effects they have caused.  It was a privilege to give a voice to these young men in court.”

The cases are Glenn Burton, JR. v. American Cyanamid CO., et al. – Case No. 07-cv-0303, Ravon Owens v. American Cyanamid CO., et al. – Case No. 07-cv-0441, and Cesar Sifuentes v. American Cyanamid Co., et al. – Case No. 10-cv-0075 in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin.

Edward Wallace of Wexler Wallace LLP and Fidelma L. Fitzpatrick of Motley Rice LLC were lead trial counsel. Other Wexler Wallace attorneys for the plaintiffs were Mark R. Miller, Lauren C. Kaplan, and Umar Sattar. Co-counsel were Robert J. McConnell, Sara O. Couch, and Caroline Rion of Motley Rice LLC, Vic Harding of the Warshafsky Law Firm, Peter Earle of the Law Office of Peter Earle, and Neil Leifer of Neil T. Leifer Law, LLC. For more information, please contact Edward Wallace at 312-485-0009 (eaw@wexlerwallace.com).

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Image

311 S. Wacker Drive,
Suite 5450
Chicago, IL 60606
P_312.346.2222
F_312.346.0022

  • Our Firm
  • Practice Areas
  • Cases
  • Investigations
  • Newsroom
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Statement
  • Legal Disclaimer

2023 © Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP

Wexler Boley & Elgersma uses cookies to improve the performance and functionality of this site. By using our website, you are providing us with your consent to use cookies on this site. Close Privacy Policy
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT