Skip to Main Content
Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP
  • Our Firm
    • Who We Serve
      • Shareholders
      • Whistleblowers
      • Consumers
      • Businesses
      • Government Entities
    • Our Professionals
    • Working with Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP
    • Locations
    • News
    • Careers
    • Report Your Concern
    • Testimonials
  • Practice Areas
    • Antitrust Litigation
    • Business & Commercial Litigation
    • Securities & Corporate Governance
    • Healthcare Litigation
    • Consumer Protection
    • Whistle Blower False Claims Litigation
    • Government Representation
    • Employment Litigation
  • Cases
    • Antitrust Litigation Cases
    • Business & Commercial Litigation Cases
    • Consumer Protection Cases
    • Employment Litigation Cases
    • Government Representation Cases
    • Healthcare Litigation Cases
    • Mass Tort Litigation Cases
    • Securities & Corporate Governance Cases
    • Whistle Blower False Claims Cases
  • Investigations
    • Rental Rate Antitrust Lawsuit
    • Automobile 3G Network Shutdown Lawsuit
    • Similac Toxic Infant Formula Lawsuit
    • Kid’s Castle Biometric Privacy Lawsuit
    • Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit
    • Fatal Sportmix Pet Food Recall Class Action Lawsuit
    • Claire’s Data Breach Lawsuit
    • Insurance Denial for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Treatment
    • Perpetual Sales Litigation
    • Railroad Price-Fixing Lawsuit
    • Medicare Advantage Fraud Litigation
    • Biometric Fingerprinting Litigation
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
See all news
1.15.2020

Appeals Court Upholds Prolift Mesh Verdict Against Johnson & Johnson

The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals has upheld a 2018 jury verdict in Kaiser v. Ethicon, in which a United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana jury awarded Plaintiff Barbara Kaiser $10 million in compensation for her injuries, and $25 million in punitive damages as punishment to Johnson & Johnson for its willful and wanton disregard for patient safety. Punitive damages were ultimately reduced to $10 million by the trial judge.

In the decision, issued on Tuesday, January 14, 2020, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the trial court’s original ruling on Ethicon’s design defect liability and failure to warn about the device. The three-judge panel also rejected Ethicon’s appeal for a new trial regarding jury instructions and evidentiary issues. The Seventh Circuit panel included Judge Diane Sykes, Judge Joel Flaum, and Judge Michael Kanne.

In the ruling penned by Judge Diane S. Sykes, the Seventh Circuit issued a full rejection of Ethicon’s arguments, stating:

“Ethicon’s appeal is a broad-spectrum attack on the judgment, starting with an argument about federal preemption and moving through several issues of Indiana product liability law, a claimed evidentiary error, and challenges to the compensatory and punitive damages. We reject these arguments and affirm.”

The court also deferred to the Indiana Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in TRW Vehicle Safety Sys., Inc. v. Moore on the issue of whether the Indiana Product Liability Act requires a plaintiff in a design defect case to produce evidence of a reasonable alternative design for the product.

“We’re very pleased by the court’s ruling, and very happy for the Kaiser family,” said Wexler Wallace Partner Edward A. Wallace. “The jury spoke with its verdict, and this ruling validates their work.”

“We are happy the 7th Circuit did not disturb the jury’s findings that the Prolift is dangerous and that the warnings were inadequate,” said Wagstaff & Cartmell Partner Jeffrey M. Kuntz.  “Mr. and Mrs. Kaiser put their personal life on trial in order to stand up against one of the largest Pharmaceutical Companies in the World.  It was an honor to represent them.”

“This is a great result for the Barb Kaiser and a good deterrent to medical device companies putting profits before people,” said Thomas O. Plouff a trial lawyer “Of Counsel” to Costello, McMahon, Gilbreth & Murphy, Ltd.

Plaintiffs in this case are represented by Thomas O. Plouff, Costello, McMahon, Gilbreth & Murphy, Ltd., Jeffrey M. Kuntz of Wagstaff & Cartmell LLP, and Edward A. Wallace of Wexler Wallace LLP.  Mark Miller of Wexler Wallace LLP led the appellate team and argued issues before the Seventh Circuit panel, and was joined on the appellee brief by Tim Jackson of Wexler Wallace LLP and Adam Davis of Wagstaff & Cartmell LLP. The trial team also included Andy Faes of Wagstaff and Cartmell LLP and others. For more information please contact Ed Wallace at 312-485-0009 (eaw@wexlerwallace.com), Jeff Kuntz at 816-522-5752 (jkuntz@wagstaffcartmell.com), or Tom Plouff at  TPlouff@costellaw.com

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Image

311 S. Wacker Drive,
Suite 5450
Chicago, IL 60606
P_312.346.2222
F_312.346.0022

  • Our Firm
  • Practice Areas
  • Cases
  • Investigations
  • Newsroom
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Statement
  • Legal Disclaimer

2023 © Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP

Wexler Boley & Elgersma uses cookies to improve the performance and functionality of this site. By using our website, you are providing us with your consent to use cookies on this site. Close Privacy Policy
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT