Skip to Main Content
Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP
  • Our Firm
    • Who We Serve
      • Shareholders
      • Whistleblowers
      • Consumers
      • Businesses
      • Government Entities
    • Our Professionals
    • Working with Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP
    • Locations
    • News
    • Careers
    • Report Your Concern
    • Testimonials
  • Practice Areas
    • Antitrust Litigation
    • Business & Commercial Litigation
    • Securities & Corporate Governance
    • Healthcare Litigation
    • Consumer Protection
    • Whistle Blower False Claims Litigation
    • Government Representation
    • Employment Litigation
  • Cases
    • Antitrust Litigation Cases
    • Business & Commercial Litigation Cases
    • Consumer Protection Cases
    • Employment Litigation Cases
    • Government Representation Cases
    • Healthcare Litigation Cases
    • Mass Tort Litigation Cases
    • Securities & Corporate Governance Cases
    • Whistle Blower False Claims Cases
  • Investigations
    • Similac Toxic Infant Formula Lawsuit
    • Kid’s Castle Biometric Privacy Lawsuit
    • Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit
    • Fatal Sportmix Pet Food Recall Class Action Lawsuit
    • Claire’s Data Breach Lawsuit
    • Insurance Denial for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Treatment
    • Perpetual Sales Litigation
    • Railroad Price-Fixing Lawsuit
    • Medicare Advantage Fraud Litigation
    • Biometric Fingerprinting Litigation
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
See all news
12.12.2012

Dawn Goulet, Mark Miller Published in ITLA Magazine

An article written by Wexler Wallace attorneys Dawn Goulet and Mark Miller was recently published in Trial Journal, a publication of the Illinois Trial Lawyers Association (ITLA). The article examines the Seventh Circuit’s decision in Show v. Ford, 659 F.3d 584 (7th Cir. 2011) as it relates to established Illinois product liability law. The article focuses on how Illinois courts have adopted an integrated test for design defect based in part on the Restatement of Tort. Under this test, parties seeking to litigate a design defect can choose to employ either the consumer expectation test or the risk-utility test.

The article criticizes the Seventh Circuit’s use of dicta to undercut the consumer-expectation test as a viable, alternative test, concluding that there is still an important role for the lay judgment of jurors in product defect cases:

We ask juries to make tough decisions every day, knowing that jurors are not perfect.  We do so because we still believe that there is value in having a group of real human beings, as representatives of our society, tell us what they consider to be reasonable or unreasonable.  The Seventh Circuit’s decision in Show v. Ford is a disappointing rejection of this basic principal.

A full copy of the article appears in the publication’s Winter 2013 edition. To learn more about Wexler Wallace’s product liability practice, please click here.

Share

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Image

311 S. Wacker Drive,
Suite 5450
Chicago, IL 60606
P_312.346.2222
F_312.346.0022

  • Our Firm
  • Practice Areas
  • Cases
  • Investigations
  • Newsroom
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Statement
  • Legal Disclaimer

2022 © Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP