Skip to Main Content
Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP
  • Our Firm
    • Who We Serve
      • Shareholders
      • Whistleblowers
      • Consumers
      • Businesses
      • Government Entities
    • Our Professionals
    • Working with Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP
    • Locations
    • News
    • Careers
    • Report Your Concern
    • Testimonials
  • Practice Areas
    • Antitrust Litigation
    • Business & Commercial Litigation
    • Securities & Corporate Governance
    • Healthcare Litigation
    • Consumer Protection
    • Whistle Blower False Claims Litigation
    • Government Representation
    • Employment Litigation
  • Cases
    • Antitrust Litigation Cases
    • Business & Commercial Litigation Cases
    • Consumer Protection Cases
    • Employment Litigation Cases
    • Government Representation Cases
    • Healthcare Litigation Cases
    • Mass Tort Litigation Cases
    • Securities & Corporate Governance Cases
    • Whistle Blower False Claims Cases
  • Investigations
    • Similac Toxic Infant Formula Lawsuit
    • Kid’s Castle Biometric Privacy Lawsuit
    • Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit
    • Fatal Sportmix Pet Food Recall Class Action Lawsuit
    • Claire’s Data Breach Lawsuit
    • Insurance Denial for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Treatment
    • Perpetual Sales Litigation
    • Railroad Price-Fixing Lawsuit
    • Medicare Advantage Fraud Litigation
    • Biometric Fingerprinting Litigation
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
See all blog posts
5.23.2018

Illinois Talcum Powder Plaintiffs Can Stay in Cook County

By Lauren Kaplan
Uncategorized, In The News, Chicago, For Consumers

A Chicago federal judge recently granted victory for five Chicago talcum powder plaintiffs with claims against Johnson & Johnson that could have huge implications for multidistrict litigations. In April, Judge Jorge Alonso in the Northern District of Illinois held that the inclusion of claims against Walgreens, an Illinois company, in addition to claims against Johnson & Johnson allowed the plaintiffs to bring their talcum powder injury cases against both defendants in state court rather than federal court. These complaints alleged that the plaintiffs were diagnosed with cancer after using Johnson & Johnson’s talcum powder, sold to them by Walgreens.

Plaintiffs initially filed their cases in the Illinois state court, but Johnson & Johnson removed the cases to federal court and sought to have them combined with the thousands of other cases in the Multidistrict Litigation in New Jersey. Attorneys for the five plaintiffs, however, asked Judge Alonso to send the cases back to the Circuit Court of Cook County arguing that, since Walgreens is an Illinois company, the case lacked “complete diversity” between the parties.

In granting plaintiffs’ motion, Judge Alonso rejected Johnson & Johnson’s assertion that plaintiffs only brought claims against Walgreens to defeat diversity and keep the cases in state court. Judge Alonso quoted from a 2011 Seventh Circuit decision in holding that to defeat jurisdictional questions, Johnson & Johnson would have to prove that plaintiffs’ claims are “utterly groundless”—a standard Johnson & Johnson had failed to meet.

In so holding, Judge Alonso gave credit to the notion that Walgreens could be liable for introducing products, such as talcum powder, into the stream of commerce while knowing that the product could increase the risk of ovarian cancer in women.

Not only that, but Judge Alonso’s decision gives local plaintiffs in multidistrict litigation another avenue to remain in state court—should that be their preferred forum. We are looking forward to seeing how this decision plays out; not only in the talcum powder cases, but also in other multidistrict litigations.

Share

No Comments

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Receive News Updates

Get the latest from Wexler Wallace LLP & stay informed.

Categories

  • Media Appearances
  • Uncategorized
  • Columns
    • Guest Post
    • Ken Wexler
    • Ed Wallace
  • Practice Areas
    • Consumer Protection
    • Mass Tort Litigation
    • Business & Commercial Litigation
    • Healthcare Litigation
    • Employment Litigation
  • Cases
  • Hall Of Shame
    • Villain Of The Week
  • In The News
    • Public Victories
  • Featured Investigations
  • The Firm
    • News releases
    • Around The World
    • Our Professionals
    • Chicago
  • You Should Know
    • For Investors
    • For Businesses
    • For Consumers
  • Featured Cases
  • awards
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Image

311 S. Wacker Drive,
Suite 5450
Chicago, IL 60606
P_312.346.2222
F_312.346.0022

  • Our Firm
  • Practice Areas
  • Cases
  • Investigations
  • Newsroom
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Statement
  • Legal Disclaimer

2022 © Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP