Skip to Main Content
Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP
  • Our Firm
    • Who We Serve
      • Shareholders
      • Whistleblowers
      • Consumers
      • Businesses
      • Government Entities
    • Our Professionals
    • Working with Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP
    • Locations
    • News
    • Careers
    • Report Your Concern
    • Testimonials
  • Practice Areas
    • Antitrust Litigation
    • Business & Commercial Litigation
    • Securities & Corporate Governance
    • Healthcare Litigation
    • Consumer Protection
    • Whistle Blower False Claims Litigation
    • Government Representation
    • Employment Litigation
  • Cases
    • Antitrust Litigation Cases
    • Business & Commercial Litigation Cases
    • Consumer Protection Cases
    • Employment Litigation Cases
    • Government Representation Cases
    • Healthcare Litigation Cases
    • Mass Tort Litigation Cases
    • Securities & Corporate Governance Cases
    • Whistle Blower False Claims Cases
  • Investigations
    • Similac Toxic Infant Formula Lawsuit
    • Kid’s Castle Biometric Privacy Lawsuit
    • Contaminated Baby Food Lawsuit
    • Fatal Sportmix Pet Food Recall Class Action Lawsuit
    • Claire’s Data Breach Lawsuit
    • Insurance Denial for Mental Health and Substance Abuse Treatment
    • Perpetual Sales Litigation
    • Railroad Price-Fixing Lawsuit
    • Medicare Advantage Fraud Litigation
    • Biometric Fingerprinting Litigation
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
See all blog posts
6.19.2019

9th Circuit Rules CFPB Leadership Structure is Constitutional

By Brian Lynch
In The News

9th circuit court of appeals

We’ve talked a lot about the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) over the years. We’ve applauded the bureau’s work going after predatory lenders and fighting against mandatory arbitration clauses, and we’ve lamented the neutering of the CFPB under the Trump administration. But while the CFPB is still beleaguered by challenges to the agency’s leadership and critics in Washington who would love to see the bureau erased altogether, the CFPB recently scored a small but significant victory: The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the CFPB’s leadership structure is constitutional.

On May 6, 2019, the three-judge Ninth Circuit panel unanimously ruled that the CFPB’s single-director structure is constitutionally sound, citing Supreme Court precedent set in Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, 295 U.S. 602 (1935), and Morrison v. Olson, 487 U.S. 654 (1988):

“Those cases indicate that the for-cause removal restriction protecting the CFPB’s Director does not ‘impede the President’s ability to perform his constitutional duty’ to ensure that the laws are faithfully executed,” wrote Judge Paul J. Watford in the panel’s opinion.

The Ninth Circuit also relied on an earlier D.C. Circuit Court’s en banc PHH decision which also found the leadership structure to be constitutional. The ruling shot down Seila Law’s appeal to set aside a CFPB civil investigative demand on the grounds that the CID was invalid due to the bureau’s alleged unconstitutional leadership structure.

In addition to rejecting the constitutional challenge, the Ninth Circuit ruled that the CID did not violate the Consumer Financial Protection Act’s practice-of-law exclusion which prevents the CFPB from exercising “supervisory or enforcement authority with respect to an activity engaged in by an attorney as part of the practice of law under the laws of a State in which the attorney is licensed to practice law.” The Ninth Circuit determined that the CID fell within the exception allowing the bureau to investigate whether Seila Law was violating the Telemarketing Sales Rule without regard to the general practice of law exclusion.

This was an important victory for the CFPB, but the battle is far from over. Two other cases involving the CFPB’s constitutionality are pending in circuit courts, either of which could create a circuit split that could move the Supreme Court to step in. We’ll be following these cases closely over the coming months.

 

Photo Credit: Ken Lund

Share

No Comments

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Receive News Updates

Get the latest from Wexler Wallace LLP & stay informed.

Categories

  • Media Appearances
  • Uncategorized
  • Columns
    • Guest Post
    • Ken Wexler
    • Ed Wallace
  • Practice Areas
    • Consumer Protection
    • Mass Tort Litigation
    • Business & Commercial Litigation
    • Healthcare Litigation
    • Employment Litigation
  • Cases
  • Hall Of Shame
    • Villain Of The Week
  • In The News
    • Public Victories
  • Featured Investigations
  • The Firm
    • News releases
    • Around The World
    • Our Professionals
    • Chicago
  • You Should Know
    • For Investors
    • For Businesses
    • For Consumers
  • Featured Cases
  • awards
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
Image

311 S. Wacker Drive,
Suite 5450
Chicago, IL 60606
P_312.346.2222
F_312.346.0022

  • Our Firm
  • Practice Areas
  • Cases
  • Investigations
  • Newsroom
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
  • Sitemap
  • Privacy Statement
  • Legal Disclaimer

2022 © Wexler Boley & Elgersma LLP